Partner integration guideWegovycare | Integration evaluation

Evaluating Prism for Wegovycare

A practical walkthrough for product, engineering, and UX teams evaluating body scanning in a partner experience.

Understand the integration

Review the technical outline, checklist, API reference, SDKs, and sample code.Open Prism documentation

Plan the user experience

Review capture guidance, user journeys, results presentation, and consent requirements.

Technical review→UX and consent→Sample outputs→Sandbox evaluation

Open the linked resources as you evaluate. If a destination is unavailable or requires access, contact Prism; source links are preserved as supplied.

Prism partner evaluation guidance | Technical and UX walkthrough1 / 8
01 | Technical reviewWegovycare | Integration evaluation

Start with the integration materials

API reference

Review the technical interface with the engineers who will build and test the integration.Open API reference

SDKs and sample code

Review Prism’s SDKs and GitHub examples alongside the API documentation.Explore Prism GitHub

Questions to bring to Prism

Identify the intended user journey, integration approach, and any unanswered implementation questions.

Use the linked technical materials to prepare questions. If a link is unavailable, ask Prism for the current destination or access.

Prism partner evaluation guidance | Integration outline, checklist, API reference, SDKs2 / 8
02 | Capture experienceWegovycare | Integration evaluation

Make scan quality part of the flow

Before the scan

Review the guide to getting a quality body scan. Plan the preparation and instructions users see before starting.Read quality-scan guidance

During experience design

Review the new-user and returning-user flows, including how scan review and guidance appear in context.

Include an operational review

  • Make scan outcomes visible to the team reviewing the experience.
  • Review unsuccessful attempts and the guidance users receive.
  • Use findings to revisit pre-scan education and the journey.

This is a review checklist, not a claim that any single design change will improve outcomes.

Prism partner evaluation guidance | Quality-scan guide and provider-support experience3 / 8
03 | UX and resultsWegovycare | Integration evaluation

Review the journey beyond capture

User journeys and high-fidelity mocks

Review the reference journeys before designing the first-scan and returning-user experiences.View user journeys and mocks

Reference-app designs

Ask for access to the reference-app Figma through the supporting UX documentation. Confirm that the evaluation team can open the files.

Progress over time

Consider how users return to compare results. Keep measured scans distinct from any projected Future Me visualization.

Reference designs support evaluation; they are not a substitute for reviewing the final partner experience.

Prism partner evaluation guidance | UX references and metric-display recommendations4 / 8
04 | ConsentWegovycare | Integration evaluation

Review consent before implementation

Example screens

Use the example screens to understand the intended presentation, then review the proposed partner implementation.

Prism’s consent guidance is general guidance. It is not UK-specific or Wegovycare-specific legal clearance.

Have the relevant legal and privacy reviewers assess the proposed experience before release.

Prism partner evaluation guidance | Consent requirements and example screens5 / 8
05 | Output reviewWegovycare | Integration evaluation

Inspect the sample output formats

Avatar files

Review the example avatar’s geometry and texture files together.Open avatar example

What to check

  • Can engineering read and work with each supplied format?
  • Which outputs are needed for the proposed experience?
  • What questions remain about displaying those outputs?

Open the linked sample files to review the formats. This guide links to, but does not embed, individual outputs. Ask Prism if a file requires access.

Prism partner evaluation guidance | Circumference JSON, body fat JSON, avatar example6 / 8
06 | SandboxWegovycare | Integration evaluation

Arrange the engineering evaluation

1. Identify the engineers

Send Prism the email addresses of the Wegovycare engineers who need sandbox access, through the agreed private channel.

2. Coordinate access with Connor

Connor coordinates sandbox API setup, the token, and the evaluation agreement.

3. Review the evaluation together

Use the documentation, sample outputs, and UX references to collect implementation questions for Prism.

Contact [email protected] to coordinate the evaluation. Do not put tokens or personal details into public materials.

Prism partner evaluation guidance | Sandbox setup and evaluation agreement7 / 8
07 | Evidence and next stepsWegovycare | Integration evaluation

Bring the evaluation together

Your evaluation checklist

  • Technical documentation and SDK review
  • Quality-scan, UX, results, and consent review
  • Sample-output review and sandbox coordination

Body composition is presented in a wellness and fitness context. The provider case study is not a Wegovycare outcomes study.

For resource access, evaluation questions, or the latest Novo channel presentation: [email protected]